<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Remember to Say Thank You</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.christopheravery.com/blog/remember-to-say-thank-you/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.christopheravery.com/blog/remember-to-say-thank-you/</link>
	<description>Responsible Leadership, Teamwork, and Change</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 13:56:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Avery</title>
		<link>http://www.christopheravery.com/blog/remember-to-say-thank-you/#comment-182</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Avery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 15:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christopheravery.com/blog/?p=482#comment-182</guid>
		<description>Anja, that&#039;s an interesting justification your friends make, that replying with &quot;thank you&quot; is inefficient. I sense it is a common justification though as you say. However, I believe the opposite, that saying &quot;Thanks&quot; is one of the most efficient uses of our relationship time and attention.

Just for fun, I was searching on my morning walk with my family and our dogs for an analogy about efficiency and resources. What I arrived at was the idea that it must be similarly   inefficient to prime a pump (what a waste of precious water). Then I realized that the efficiency claim rests on a resource actually being scarce, but a relationship is not a commodity.

Thanks for your spark...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anja, that&#8217;s an interesting justification your friends make, that replying with &#8220;thank you&#8221; is inefficient. I sense it is a common justification though as you say. However, I believe the opposite, that saying &#8220;Thanks&#8221; is one of the most efficient uses of our relationship time and attention.</p>
<p>Just for fun, I was searching on my morning walk with my family and our dogs for an analogy about efficiency and resources. What I arrived at was the idea that it must be similarly   inefficient to prime a pump (what a waste of precious water). Then I realized that the efficiency claim rests on a resource actually being scarce, but a relationship is not a commodity.</p>
<p>Thanks for your spark&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anja</title>
		<link>http://www.christopheravery.com/blog/remember-to-say-thank-you/#comment-181</link>
		<dc:creator>Anja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 07:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christopheravery.com/blog/?p=482#comment-181</guid>
		<description>Christopher - you have made a good point. I think people say &quot;Thank you&quot; too seldom. I live in Europe and my US friends have told me that they usually do not write back &quot;thank you&quot; because this is a waste and not important message. Same feedback I got from some of my EU collegues. How much easier and more pleasent the life would be if people say/writie a small simple &quot;thank you&quot;. Doesn&#039;t cost a lot...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christopher &#8211; you have made a good point. I think people say &#8220;Thank you&#8221; too seldom. I live in Europe and my US friends have told me that they usually do not write back &#8220;thank you&#8221; because this is a waste and not important message. Same feedback I got from some of my EU collegues. How much easier and more pleasent the life would be if people say/writie a small simple &#8220;thank you&#8221;. Doesn&#8217;t cost a lot&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

